In the United States, these passports are prohibited under a new executive order.
The ambitious and controversial immigration policy that President Donald Trump had been working on was made public on the 20th of January, 2025, only a few moments after he had taken the oath of office himself.
A number of executive orders that were broad in scope were issued by the newly inaugurated president of the United States, which resulted in significant adjustments in the way that the United States government takes to immigration policy policies. Notable among the measures that received the greatest attention are the following:
The elimination of citizenship based on birthright of citizens
The most contentious of these decrees is perhaps this directive, which tries to make a significant change to a principle that has been profoundly embedded in the legal system of the United States.
If a kid’s parents do not meet specific standards, the government authorities have been given the command to withhold citizenship to the child. This directive applies to children who were born in the United States of America.
To be more explicit, children who are born to mothers who are either undocumented or on temporary visas and whose fathers are not nationals or permanent residents of the United States will no longer be eligible for citizenship. Other children who are born to moms who are on temporary visas will continue to be eligible for citizenship.
In addition, the regulation forbids these children from obtaining passports to enter the United States once thirty days have passed since the ban was imposed against them.
There is no obvious indication of the legal position that these infants will hold when they are born, and the implications of this ruling are still uncertain. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence of anything. A number of individuals are of the opinion that this could lead to a generation of individuals who do not possess a nationality. This would then lead to heated debates concerning the legality of the decree and the impact it would have on humanitarian assistance.
The implementation of Task Forces and Enhanced Vetting Procedures
Additionally, in conjunction with the birthright citizenship directive, additional instructions that are centered on immigration enforcement have been issued into the air.
According to these directives, “Homeland Security Task Forces” will be established, and new screening procedures for immigrants will be implemented that are more strict than before. In order to strengthen national security and ensure that immigration pathways are subject to a more strict level of government surveillance, the administration asserts that these regulations are meant to help protect national security.
A record of the executive orders that were issued
As a bold statement of his authority as he charts a new course for his administration, President Donald Trump is believed to have signed almost 200 executive orders in a single day, according to BBC News. This information was revealed by the news organization. Executive orders, as opposed to legislation, are directions that are given by the president to the federal government rather than being passed by Congress.
With the stroke of a pen, these directives allow for large changes to be made, so avoiding the need to go through Congress.
In accordance with the provocative title of one of the orders that he signed, which read, “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” he really signed one of the orders that sparked the most controversy.
Since the legislation wants to redefine gender in federal policy as only male and female, it quickly stirred up controversy after it was announced. This is because the legislation intends to redefine gender as merely male and female.
Changes that are considered to be the most significant under the Executive Order
There have been a number of notable effects brought about by this arrangement, including the following:
In accordance with the policies of the prison system, transgender individuals would no longer be housed in female prisons. However, LGBTQ+ organizations have harshly opposed this move, stating that it is both unpleasant and discriminatory. This action was described as assuring “biological truth.”
The decree, which was geared toward issuing passports to non-binary people, also targeted non-binary people in the United States.
The Department of State of the United States of America has implemented a ban on all applications for passports that include the “X” gender identification, which was included for the first time in October of 2021. It is immediately effective that this restriction is in place.
For over 1.2 million persons in the United States who identify as non-binary, this regulation has the potential to have an effect on their lives.
A Return to Binary and an End to the Use of “X” Markers respectively
In an email that was obtained by The Guardian, Secretary of State Marco Rubio repeated the position that the administration has taken stance on. According to what he said, “The United States of America adheres to the principle that an individual’s sexual orientation cannot be altered.”
Applications that requested a “X” marker or any other sex marker adjustments were immediately stopped by the staff as a direct result of Rubio’s direction. This directive was issued to the staff. Individuals who do not identify as either male or female were effectively deprived of the opportunity offered by this.
Passports that are already in existence and have the classification “X” will continue to be valid for the time being; however, as a result of the new rules, it is predicted that the processes of renewing and updating passports will be substantially more complex.
Some people have expressed concern that this could lead to a significant number of non-binary people in the United States being unable to travel in the near future because they do not possess the necessary travel documents on their person.