Ash Putnam, a 23-year-old woman with a striking appearance that includes facial piercings and tattoos, never imagined that her annoyance at being turned down for a job would become the subject of a global TikTok debate. In addition to drawing sympathy, her film, which told her story of being rejected for a job at TJ Maxx, triggered a contentious discussion regarding body art, hiring procedures, and the social definition of professional look.
Putnam revealed in her video that she had applied for a job at TJ Maxx but was automatically rejected by email. Even though “insufficient training” was mentioned in the email as the reason for the rejection, Putnam couldn’t get rid of the impression that her obvious piercings and tattoos had a bigger role. She said, clearly angry, “It felt like a cold, impersonal response.” “I can’t help but wonder if my tattoos played a role in their decision, and they didn’t even bother to properly explain the reasoning.”
@ashxobrien I want to know who is also having a hard time finding a job right now! #jobs #jobmarket
Putnam’s TikTok video went viral very fast, receiving thousands of views and a flurry of comments. Many users thought that her looks, especially her facial tattoos, would have affected the store’s choice, while others sympathized with her predicament. “I’ve had experiences like this,” a commenter said. “I’ve been turned down for jobs because of my tattoos too.” “I think they’re just being honest about what they expect from employees—appearance matters,” said another commenter.
Those who supported Putnam, on the other hand, contended that a person’s professional qualities shouldn’t be impacted by their body piercings or tattoos. One user asked, “Why are we still judging people based on their appearance in 2024?” “Your tattoos have no bearing whatsoever on your ability to perform a job.” Other readers voiced their displeasure with antiquated assumptions, pointing out that many body art artists are highly skilled, committed professionals with advanced degrees. According to a another TikTok user, “Some of the smartest people I know have tattoos,” “It’s time to stop associating body art with a lack of professionalism.”
Putnam saw the rejection as a challenge to the way society perceives body art in the workplace, rather than merely a personal setback. Although not “traditional,” she thinks piercings and tattoos don’t define a person’s skills or personality. In her video, she stated, “I just want to be given a fair shot,” “My work ethic and abilities are not conveyed by my tattoos.”
Putnam continued by saying that body alteration, including tattoos and piercings, is frequently viewed as a way for people to express themselves rather than as a reflection of their ability. She emphasized that body art should not be viewed as a barrier to employment, but rather as an additional form of individualism, similar to how people express themselves through hobbies, music, or fashion. “I believe that companies ought to reevaluate their attitudes regarding tattoos,” she added. “Some of the smartest, most committed people I’ve ever encountered have tattoos and body piercings. It is necessary to dispel these outdated preconceptions.
Putnam’s story has fueled a continuing discussion around body art in the workplace. Even while tattoos are becoming more and more popular, particularly among younger people, many places of employment still maintain rigorous hygiene and appearance standards that forbid visible piercings and tattoos. The impact of body art on hiring practices is a complicated topic in sectors like computing, retail, and hospitality.
According to some companies, keeping a “neutral” or “polished” look is crucial for representing the brand’s image and drawing in a wide range of customers. Others contend that abilities, not looks, should be used to evaluate professionalism. One business owner commented, “We hire people for what they can do, not how they look.” However, Putnam’s video and the discussion that follows demonstrate that not everyone holds this opinion, particularly in a setting where workplace culture is increasingly centered around diversity and inclusion.
Putnam’s story’s controversy draws attention to a profound societal change that is gradually taking place. Many are wondering if companies will eventually change to be more welcoming of body art as more people with tattoos and piercings join the job. Some businesses have already adopted a more laid-back approach toward appearance, especially in the creative industries, but others are still mired in antiquated notions of what is “appropriate” in the workplace.
The workplace may need to change, though, as societal perceptions continue to change and younger generations call for a broader acceptance of diversity in all its manifestations. According to research, happier and more productive workers are those who feel free to be who they really are at work. Eventually, more businesses might reevaluate their rules in light of the fact that professionalism and talent aren’t determined by a person’s appearance.
Putnam’s story and the widespread reaction it received show how workplace diversity is evolving. It’s hoped that as more people come forward about their experiences with body art discrimination, employers will start to reconsider the standards they utilize when employing new staff. The focus should be on abilities, expertise, and work ethic rather than attractiveness.
In a subsequent video, Putnam stated, “I don’t want to feel like I have to hide parts of myself to fit in.” “Everyone should be able to apply for jobs while still being accepted for their true selves, including piercings and tattoos.”
Putnam’s TikTok video ultimately generated a conversation about a lot more than tattoos. It concerns the continuous change of workplace culture, inclusivity, and the notion that one’s abilities, not one’s appearance, should determine one’s success in the workplace. Putnam’s story has unquestionably accelerated the discussion about diversity, inclusivity, and the future of employment, but the battle is far from done.